Community Medicine (PSM) · Epidemiology (Study Designs, Bias, Systematic Review, Measures of Association)

An investigator wishes to study the association between an extremely rare cancer and occupational solvent exposure. Which study design will yield the answer most efficiently?

  • A Prospective cohort study
  • B Cross-sectional study
  • C Case-control study
  • D Ecological study
Correct answer: C. Case-control study

Explanation

Case-control studies begin with all available cases of the rare disease, so even a handful of cases can be studied directly. A prospective cohort would need to enroll hundreds of thousands of exposed and unexposed subjects and wait years to accumulate enough cases, making it grossly inefficient for rare outcomes. Cross-sectional studies measure prevalence, not causation, and ecological studies suffer from the ecological fallacy.

Reference: Park's Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine, 27th ed.

High-yield for: NEET PGINI-CETNExTFMGEUSMLEPLABMRCP

Written and medically reviewed by the StethoPrep medical team.

Sponsored

Want to test yourself?

Create a free account for timed mock tests, mistake tracking, and FSRS spaced-repetition revision across 43,000+ MCQs.

Start free → Log in

More Epidemiology (Study Designs, Bias, Systematic Review, Measures of Association) MCQs

See all Epidemiology (Study Designs, Bias, Systematic Review, Measures of Association) MCQs →