A pharmaceutical company maintains a cohort of 50,000 patients with stored serum samples collected at enrolment. Over 8 years, 300 patients develop rheumatoid arthritis. To test whether anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies predict future disease, investigators assay the stored samples of these 300 patients and of 600 sampled non-cases. The principal advantage of this design over a conventional case-control study is:
- A It eliminates the need for a control group
- B It is immune to all forms of selection bias
- C It allows direct calculation of relative risk for the entire cohort
- D Exposure is documented before disease onset, preserving temporal sequence ✓
Explanation
This is a nested case-control study conducted within an existing cohort. Because serum was collected before any patient developed arthritis, reverse causation and recall bias are avoided, which is its chief advantage over a conventional retrospective case-control study. Controls are still required, so option A is wrong, and incidence in the full cohort cannot be directly computed without assaying everyone. Selection bias is reduced, not abolished.
Reference: Modern Epidemiology (Rothman, Greenland, Lash), 4th ed.
High-yield for: NEET PGINI-CETNExTFMGEUSMLEPLABMRCP
Written and medically reviewed by the StethoPrep medical team.