Community Medicine (PSM) · Epidemiology (Study Designs, Bias, Systematic Review, Measures of Association)

A systematic review comparing two antihypertensives calculates I² = 78%. The most appropriate next step in the meta-analysis is:

  • A Proceed with fixed-effects pooling
  • B Discard the meta-analysis as inconclusive
  • C Use random-effects model and explore sources of heterogeneity
  • D Apply funnel plot asymmetry correction only
Correct answer: C. Use random-effects model and explore sources of heterogeneity

Explanation

An I² of 78% indicates substantial heterogeneity (>75%). The appropriate approach is to use a random-effects model rather than fixed-effects pooling, and to explore the source of heterogeneity through subgroup analysis or meta-regression. Discarding the analysis is not standard practice; funnel plot asymmetry addresses publication bias, not statistical heterogeneity.

Reference: Park's Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine, 27th ed.

High-yield for: NEET PGINI-CETNExTFMGEUSMLEPLABMRCP

Written and medically reviewed by the StethoPrep medical team.

Sponsored

Want to test yourself?

Create a free account for timed mock tests, mistake tracking, and FSRS spaced-repetition revision across 23,000+ MCQs.

Start free → Log in

More Epidemiology (Study Designs, Bias, Systematic Review, Measures of Association) MCQs

See all Epidemiology (Study Designs, Bias, Systematic Review, Measures of Association) MCQs →