Community Medicine (PSM) · Biostatistics (Measures of Central Tendency, Tests of Significance, Sampling)

A study compares an uncommon adverse outcome between a new vaccine and placebo using a 2x2 contingency table. Three of the four cells have expected frequencies less than 5. Which test should be applied instead of the ordinary chi-square test?

  • A Fisher exact test
  • B Student t-test
  • C Yates corrected chi-square
  • D Mann-Whitney U test
Correct answer: A. Fisher exact test

Explanation

The chi-square approximation is invalid when any expected cell frequency falls below 5 in a 2x2 table, because it relies on large-sample theory. Fisher exact test calculates the exact probability from the hypergeometric distribution and remains valid at any expected frequency, so it is the correct substitute. Yates correction is a continuity adjustment for marginal cases around an expected value near 5, not a remedy for grossly small expectations.

Reference: Park's Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine, 27th ed.

High-yield for: NEET PGINI-CETNExTFMGEUSMLEPLABMRCP

Written and medically reviewed by the StethoPrep medical team.

Sponsored

Want to test yourself?

Create a free account for timed mock tests, mistake tracking, and FSRS spaced-repetition revision across 43,000+ MCQs.

Start free → Log in

More Biostatistics (Measures of Central Tendency, Tests of Significance, Sampling) MCQs

See all Biostatistics (Measures of Central Tendency, Tests of Significance, Sampling) MCQs →