A researcher performs multiple subgroup analyses in a single RCT without pre-specifying them in the protocol. The probability of a Type I error across all comparisons is BEST reduced by:
- A Using one-tailed instead of two-tailed tests
- B Increasing the sample size
- C Bonferroni correction ✓
- D Switching from parametric to non-parametric tests
Explanation
When multiple comparisons are made, the probability of a spurious significant result (Type I error) increases dramatically — with 20 tests at alpha = 0.05, one false positive is expected by chance alone. Bonferroni correction adjusts the significance threshold by dividing alpha by the number of comparisons (e.g., 0.05/10 = 0.005 for 10 tests), controlling the family-wise error rate. One-tailed tests actually increase Type I error risk; sample size affects power (Type II error), not multiple comparisons correction.
Reference: Park's Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine, 27th ed.
High-yield for: NEET PGINI-CETNExTFMGEUSMLEPLABMRCP
Written and medically reviewed by the StethoPrep medical team.