Community Medicine (PSM) · Biostatistics (Measures of Central Tendency, Tests of Significance, Sampling)

A researcher performs multiple subgroup analyses in a single RCT without pre-specifying them in the protocol. The probability of a Type I error across all comparisons is BEST reduced by:

  • A Using one-tailed instead of two-tailed tests
  • B Increasing the sample size
  • C Bonferroni correction
  • D Switching from parametric to non-parametric tests
Correct answer: C. Bonferroni correction

Explanation

When multiple comparisons are made, the probability of a spurious significant result (Type I error) increases dramatically — with 20 tests at alpha = 0.05, one false positive is expected by chance alone. Bonferroni correction adjusts the significance threshold by dividing alpha by the number of comparisons (e.g., 0.05/10 = 0.005 for 10 tests), controlling the family-wise error rate. One-tailed tests actually increase Type I error risk; sample size affects power (Type II error), not multiple comparisons correction.

Reference: Park's Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine, 27th ed.

High-yield for: NEET PGINI-CETNExTFMGEUSMLEPLABMRCP

Written and medically reviewed by the StethoPrep medical team.

Sponsored

Want to test yourself?

Create a free account for timed mock tests, mistake tracking, and FSRS spaced-repetition revision across 23,000+ MCQs.

Start free → Log in

More Biostatistics (Measures of Central Tendency, Tests of Significance, Sampling) MCQs

See all Biostatistics (Measures of Central Tendency, Tests of Significance, Sampling) MCQs →