Community Medicine (PSM) · Biostatistics (Measures of Central Tendency, Tests of Significance, Sampling)

A clinical trial reports that a new drug reduces systolic BP by 3 mmHg with p = 0.001 but 95% CI of 1–5 mmHg. A physician is deciding whether to prescribe this drug. The MOST appropriate conclusion is:

  • A The result is highly clinically significant because p < 0.05
  • B The result is statistically significant but of questionable clinical significance
  • C The result is neither statistically nor clinically significant
  • D The 95% CI being narrow confirms large clinical benefit
Correct answer: B. The result is statistically significant but of questionable clinical significance

Explanation

Statistical significance (p = 0.001) indicates that the observed effect is unlikely due to chance alone, but a 3 mmHg reduction in systolic BP has limited clinical significance (usually ≥10 mmHg reduction is considered clinically meaningful in hypertension). Large sample sizes can produce statistically significant results for trivially small effects. The 95% CI of 1–5 mmHg confirms the entire range represents only small changes. This distinction between statistical and clinical significance is a high-yield exam concept.

Reference: Park's Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine, 27th ed.

High-yield for: NEET PGINI-CETNExTFMGEUSMLEPLABMRCP

Written and medically reviewed by the StethoPrep medical team.

Sponsored

Want to test yourself?

Create a free account for timed mock tests, mistake tracking, and FSRS spaced-repetition revision across 23,000+ MCQs.

Start free → Log in

More Biostatistics (Measures of Central Tendency, Tests of Significance, Sampling) MCQs

See all Biostatistics (Measures of Central Tendency, Tests of Significance, Sampling) MCQs →