Forensic Medicine · Forensic DNA Profiling and Biological Evidence (STR, Mitochondrial DNA, Paternity, Kinship)

Familial DNA searching in a forensic database identifies a partial STR match to an uploaded crime scene profile. This technique is BEST described as:

  • A Identifying the direct perpetrator from stored convicted-offender profiles
  • B Confirming kinship in mass-disaster victim identification
  • C Detecting genetic markers for violent behavioural traits in suspects
  • D Identifying a close biological relative of the perpetrator who is in the database, providing a lead for investigation
Correct answer: D. Identifying a close biological relative of the perpetrator who is in the database, providing a lead for investigation

Explanation

Familial DNA searching exploits the fact that first-degree relatives (siblings, parent-child) share approximately 50% of their alleles. A partial match in a convicted-offender database suggests the perpetrator may be a relative of the database entrant, generating an investigative lead rather than a direct identification. This technique is controversial due to privacy implications for innocent relatives. It is distinct from direct database matching, mass-disaster kinship analysis, or behavioural genetics.

Reference: The Essentials of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology (Narayan Reddy), 34th ed.

High-yield for: NEET PGINI-CETNExTFMGEUSMLEPLABMRCP

Written and medically reviewed by the StethoPrep medical team.

Sponsored

Want to test yourself?

Create a free account for timed mock tests, mistake tracking, and FSRS spaced-repetition revision across 23,000+ MCQs.

Start free → Log in

More Forensic DNA Profiling and Biological Evidence (STR, Mitochondrial DNA, Paternity, Kinship) MCQs

See all Forensic DNA Profiling and Biological Evidence (STR, Mitochondrial DNA, Paternity, Kinship) MCQs →