Atracurium is metabolised by both Hofmann elimination and ester hydrolysis. Cisatracurium is a stereoisomer of atracurium. Which of the following is a key difference between cisatracurium and atracurium that makes cisatracurium safer in renal failure patients?
- A Cisatracurium undergoes predominantly renal elimination
- B Cisatracurium produces significantly less laudanosine, a CNS stimulant metabolite ✓
- C Cisatracurium is a depolarizing agent with faster metabolism
- D Cisatracurium is metabolised exclusively by plasma cholinesterase
Explanation
Both atracurium and cisatracurium undergo Hofmann elimination and ester hydrolysis, not renal or plasma cholinesterase metabolism. However, atracurium produces laudanosine as a byproduct of Hofmann elimination, which accumulates in renal failure and can cause CNS excitation and seizures. Cisatracurium produces much less laudanosine, making it safer in renal failure. Option D is wrong as mivacurium, not cisatracurium, is the non-depolarising agent metabolised by plasma cholinesterase.
Reference: Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, 15th ed.
High-yield for: NEET PGINI-CETNExTFMGEUSMLEPLABMRCP
Written and medically reviewed by the StethoPrep medical team.