A 55-year-old man in septic shock post-abdominal surgery has a MAP of 55 mmHg despite 3 L crystalloid. He is on noradrenaline 0.3 mcg/kg/min. His vasopressin level is expected to be low (vasopressin-deficient phase). According to the VANISH trial, adding vasopressin to noradrenaline in septic shock has which primary benefit?
- A Significant reduction in 28-day mortality
- B Improved cardiac output and stroke volume index
- C Reduction in intra-abdominal hypertension
- D Reduction in noradrenaline requirements and renal replacement therapy use ✓
Explanation
The VANISH trial (Gordon et al., JAMA 2016) compared vasopressin + hydrocortisone/placebo vs noradrenaline + hydrocortisone/placebo in septic shock. Vasopressin reduced noradrenaline requirements and significantly decreased the need for renal replacement therapy in patients with septic shock. There was no significant reduction in 28-day mortality. The benefit is primarily 'catecholamine-sparing' and renal-protective. Vasopressin acts on V1 receptors causing vasoconstriction without increasing heart rate.
Reference: Bailey & Love's Short Practice of Surgery, 27th ed.
High-yield for: NEET PGINI-CETNExTFMGEUSMLEPLABMRCP
Written and medically reviewed by the StethoPrep medical team.