Orthopedics · Joint Replacement — Advanced (THR/TKR Complications, Revision, Bearings, Periprosthetic Fractures)

A 72-year-old man with a cemented total knee replacement 8 years ago develops a Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture. The implant is found to be loose on imaging. What is the most appropriate management?

  • A Revision total knee arthroplasty using a long-stem revision femoral component with fracture fixation
  • B Open reduction and internal fixation with a locking plate
  • C Revision total hip arthroplasty with a long-stem femoral implant bypassing the fracture
  • D Conservative management with traction followed by early mobilisation
Correct answer: A. Revision total knee arthroplasty using a long-stem revision femoral component with fracture fixation

Explanation

Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fractures involve a loose femoral component, making ORIF alone inadequate since the underlying instability would persist. The standard of care is revision arthroplasty using a long-stem revision femoral component that bypasses the fracture by at least two cortical diameters, re-establishing fixation. A long-stem THR revision would apply to hip periprosthetic fractures, not knee. Conservative management is inappropriate given the loose implant.

Reference: Maheshwari Essential Orthopaedics, 6th ed.

High-yield for: NEET PGINI-CETNExTFMGEUSMLEPLABMRCP

Written and medically reviewed by the StethoPrep medical team.

Sponsored

Want to test yourself?

Create a free account for timed mock tests, mistake tracking, and FSRS spaced-repetition revision across 23,000+ MCQs.

Start free → Log in

More Joint Replacement — Advanced (THR/TKR Complications, Revision, Bearings, Periprosthetic Fractures) MCQs

See all Joint Replacement — Advanced (THR/TKR Complications, Revision, Bearings, Periprosthetic Fractures) MCQs →