During total knee replacement for severe varus osteoarthritis, the surgeon notes the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is deficient. Which implant design choice is mandated by this finding?
- A Cruciate-retaining (CR) design with a flat polyethylene insert
- B Posterior-stabilized (PS) design with a central tibial post engaging a femoral cam ✓
- C Medial pivot design relying on an asymmetric conforming surface
- D Bicompartmental replacement sparing the patellofemoral joint
Explanation
A deficient or absent PCL requires a posterior-stabilized (PS) TKR design. The PS design incorporates a central tibial polyethylene post that engages a femoral cam mechanism during flexion, substituting for PCL function in preventing posterior tibial subluxation. A cruciate-retaining implant depends on an intact PCL for rollback and stability; using CR in the absence of the PCL results in posterior tibial subluxation and failure. The other options do not address PCL deficiency.
Reference: Maheshwari Essential Orthopaedics, 6th ed.
High-yield for: NEET PGINI-CETNExTFMGEUSMLEPLABMRCP
Written and medically reviewed by the StethoPrep medical team.