The PORTEC-2 trial compared pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) in intermediate-risk endometrial carcinoma. What was the primary finding?
- A VBT provided equivalent vaginal relapse control with less gastrointestinal toxicity than EBRT ✓
- B EBRT was superior to VBT for local control and overall survival
- C VBT reduced pelvic relapse rates while EBRT only prevented vaginal recurrence
- D Observation without adjuvant radiotherapy was equivalent to VBT in intermediate-risk disease
Explanation
PORTEC-2 (Nout et al., Lancet 2010) randomized intermediate-high risk endometrial carcinoma patients (Stage I–IIA) to EBRT vs VBT. VBT achieved equivalent vaginal relapse control (1.8% vs 1.6% at 5 years) and identical overall survival, but with significantly lower rates of gastrointestinal toxicity (13.8% vs 53.8% grade 1–2 GI symptoms). This established VBT as the preferred adjuvant therapy for intermediate-risk endometrial carcinoma, replacing EBRT for vaginal vault protection.
Reference: Shaw's Textbook of Gynaecology, 17th ed.
High-yield for: NEET PGINI-CETNExTFMGEUSMLEPLABMRCP
Written and medically reviewed by the StethoPrep medical team.