Why is Xpert MTB/RIF not recommended for assessing treatment response in a patient already on antitubercular therapy?
- A Its sensitivity falls sharply once therapy has begun
- B MTB DNA persists after bacillary death, so positivity does not distinguish live from killed organisms ✓
- C Prior antibiotic exposure permanently abolishes the rpoB signal
- D Its internal control fails in post-treatment specimens
Explanation
NAAT detects DNA regardless of viability, and MTB DNA remains amplifiable for weeks after effective killing begins. A positive Xpert during follow up therefore cannot separate treatment failure from residual dead bacilli. Culture, which grows only viable organisms, remains the reference standard for monitoring, with smear as a practical adjunct. Sensitivity does not fall because of prior therapy, antibiotics do not erase the rpoB target, and the internal control functions normally.
Reference: Mandell, Douglas and Bennett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, 9th ed.
High-yield for: NEET PGINI-CETNExTFMGEUSMLEPLABMRCP
Written and medically reviewed by the StethoPrep medical team.