Microbiology · Antimicrobial Resistance Mechanisms and Susceptibility Testing (ESBL, MRSA, VRE, CRE, MIC/MBC, E-test)

An E. coli isolate from a UTI shows resistance to cefotaxime and ceftazidime but susceptibility to cefoxitin and carbapenems. The ESBL phenotype is confirmed by the combination disc test showing ≥5 mm increase in inhibition zone with cefotaxime + clavulanic acid versus cefotaxime alone. Which enzyme class is most likely responsible?

  • A NDM-1 (New Delhi Metallo-beta-lactamase, class B)
  • B CTX-M type ESBL (plasmid-mediated class A beta-lactamase)
  • C OXA-48 (class D carbapenemase)
  • D AmpC beta-lactamase (class C, cephalosporinase)
Correct answer: B. CTX-M type ESBL (plasmid-mediated class A beta-lactamase)

Explanation

CTX-M ESBLs are the predominant ESBL type globally (>90% of ESBLs) and in India; they are class A serine beta-lactamases encoded on conjugative plasmids. They preferentially hydrolyse cefotaxime (hence CTX) over ceftazidime (unlike TEM/SHV ESBLs). ESBL confirmation: ≥5 mm zone enhancement with clavulanate (clavulanate inhibits class A ESBLs). Susceptibility to cefoxitin rules out AmpC (AmpC ESBLs are resistant to cefoxitin). Carbapenems remain active because ESBLs are inhibited by clavulanate and do not hydrolyse carbapenems. NDM-1 and OXA-48 are carbapenemases — they cause carbapenem resistance.

Reference: Ananthanarayan & Paniker's Textbook of Microbiology, 11th ed.

High-yield for: NEET PGINI-CETNExTFMGEUSMLEPLABMRCP

Written and medically reviewed by the StethoPrep medical team.

Sponsored

Want to test yourself?

Create a free account for timed mock tests, mistake tracking, and FSRS spaced-repetition revision across 23,000+ MCQs.

Start free → Log in

More Antimicrobial Resistance Mechanisms and Susceptibility Testing (ESBL, MRSA, VRE, CRE, MIC/MBC, E-test) MCQs

See all Antimicrobial Resistance Mechanisms and Susceptibility Testing (ESBL, MRSA, VRE, CRE, MIC/MBC, E-test) MCQs →