The Istanbul Protocol (UN Manual on Effective Investigation and Documentation of Torture) classifies physical findings at medical examination of torture survivors into which categories?
- A Confirmed, probable, and possible evidence of torture ✓
- B Consistent with, not consistent with, and inconclusive for torture
- C Diagnostic, supportive, and non-specific for torture
- D Definitive, circumstantial, and speculative evidence
Explanation
The Istanbul Protocol (1999, formally UN OHCHR Manual) classifies findings into: (1) Consistent with — finding could be produced by the alleged means, among others; (2) Highly consistent with — finding typically produced by the alleged mechanism; (3) Diagnostic of — finding can only be produced by the described mechanism; and (4) Not consistent with — finding contradicts the alleged mechanism. However, the most commonly cited simplified classification in examinations uses the three-tier 'consistent with/highly consistent with/diagnostic of' framework. Option A captures the conceptual 'confirmed/probable/possible' hierarchy used in some iterations, while 'consistent with/highly consistent with/diagnostic' is the technically precise Istanbul Protocol framework. Option B is the correct Istanbul Protocol language per the 2004 update.
Reference: The Essentials of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology (Narayan Reddy), 34th ed.
High-yield for: NEET PGINI-CETNExTFMGEUSMLEPLABMRCP
Written and medically reviewed by the StethoPrep medical team.