Under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 2023 (replacing CrPC), if a person is found to be of unsound mind during trial and unfit to make a defence, the court's procedure is governed by which section, and what is the primary determination the court must make?

• A BNSS Section 368; the court determines whether the unsoundness of mind was present at the time of the offence (insanity defence)
• B BNSS Section 370; the court determines fitness to plead (ability to understand charges, instruct counsel, and follow proceedings) as a prerequisite to the insanity defence
• C BNSS Section 330 (corresponding to CrPC 328); the court must first determine whether the accused is of unsound mind and incapable of making his defence (fitness to plead/stand trial), and if found unfit, proceedings are stayed and the person is cared for ✓
• D BNSS Section 302; the court convicts and then considers unsoundness of mind only at sentencing

Explanation

Under BNSS 2023 Section 330 (corresponding to CrPC Section 328), if a Magistrate or Sessions Court suspects the accused is of unsound mind, it must first hold a formal inquiry to determine fitness to stand trial (ability to understand the charge, make a defence, instruct counsel). If the accused is found unfit, the proceedings are stayed and the accused is admitted for care and treatment under appropriate authority. This is separate from the substantive insanity defence under BNS Section 22 (previously IPC Section 84). The distinction between fitness to plead (a procedural test) and insanity at the time of offence (a substantive defence) is critical.

Reference: The Essentials of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology (Narayan Reddy), 34th ed.

High-yield for: NEET PGINI-CETNExTFMGEUSMLEPLABMRCP

Written and medically reviewed by the StethoPrep medical team.