Forensic Medicine · Consent, Professional Negligence and Medical Ethics (Consumer Protection, Vicarious Liability)

The doctrine of 'corporate negligence' as applied to hospitals holds that:

  • A A hospital is liable only for the acts of its employees under respondeat superior
  • B Only the treating doctor can ever be sued for negligence in a hospital setting
  • C A hospital has an independent, non-delegable duty to ensure reasonable standards of care, staffing, equipment and credentialing of its staff
  • D A hospital is automatically liable for every adverse outcome occurring on its premises
Correct answer: C. A hospital has an independent, non-delegable duty to ensure reasonable standards of care, staffing, equipment and credentialing of its staff

Explanation

Corporate negligence, established in Darling v Charleston Community Memorial Hospital (1965), imposes a direct duty on the hospital itself to provide adequate facilities, competent staff and proper systems, separate from vicarious liability for employees. Option A describes only vicarious liability, while option D wrongly suggests strict liability for all adverse outcomes, which Indian law does not impose.

Reference: Parikh's Textbook of Medical Jurisprudence, Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, 7th ed.

High-yield for: NEET PGINI-CETNExTFMGEUSMLEPLABMRCP

Written and medically reviewed by the StethoPrep medical team.

Sponsored

Want to test yourself?

Create a free account for timed mock tests, mistake tracking, and FSRS spaced-repetition revision across 43,000+ MCQs.

Start free → Log in

More Consent, Professional Negligence and Medical Ethics (Consumer Protection, Vicarious Liability) MCQs

See all Consent, Professional Negligence and Medical Ethics (Consumer Protection, Vicarious Liability) MCQs →