Which property makes distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) preferred over transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) when detailed frequency-specific assessment of cochlear outer hair cell function is required?
- A DPOAEs are generated by inner hair cells whereas TEOAEs arise from outer hair cells
- B DPOAEs are unaffected by middle ear effusion while TEOAEs are abolished by it
- C DPOAEs provide better frequency resolution across a wider range, allowing construction of an audiogram-like cochleogram ✓
- D DPOAEs assess neural synchrony of the auditory nerve whereas TEOAEs assess cochlear function
Explanation
DPOAEs are elicited by two simultaneous pure tones and can be measured at many discrete frequencies from roughly 1 to 8 kHz, giving superior frequency specificity so results can be plotted like a cochleogram. Both emission types originate from outer hair cells and both are abolished by significant middle ear pathology, which eliminates options A and B. Assessment of neural synchrony is the domain of ABR, not any OAE, eliminating D.
Reference: Cummings Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 7th ed.
High-yield for: NEET PGINI-CETNExTFMGEUSMLEPLABMRCP
Written and medically reviewed by the StethoPrep medical team.